My point here is that history actually taught us that freedoms come with attachments. I mentioned Facebook because it enabled the government of Myanmar during

My point here is that history actually taught us that freedoms come with attachments. I mentioned Facebook because it enabled the government of Myanmar during the persecution and genocide of the Rohingya people. They could have done something, but chose to ignore it and do nothing. This is not a unique occurrence either. Freedom of speech without observing any moral or ethical consequences doesn't make you free, it makes you a libertine, and those who choose to enable these behaviours aren't innocent either. On top of it, in this scenario, Russia is waging an information war against the West, so why should we grant them the freedom to do so?