3 ms·
Not a lawyer but holding should always be fine. No trading is happening therefore it's not insider trading.
by smegma2 5y ago
Not a lawyer but holding should always be fine. No trading is happening therefore it's not insider trading.
- usrusr 5y agoOr more to the point: insider trading isn't quite as victimless as some people might like to believe. The only victim "insider holding" could have would be people betting against a trend caused by public information (who would win even more if the "insider holder" would sell with the herd), either out of pure gambling desire or because their trades are insider trades. Neither seems particularly worthy of protection.