3 ms·
"Better" for who? And many "betterments" come with downsides and trade-offs, too. It's rarely that simple.
by Beltalowda 5y ago
"Better" for who? And many "betterments" come with downsides and trade-offs, too.
It's rarely that simple.
- teknopaul 5y agoMy point was just about the ambiguity of the word progess. I agree that development/forward movement is not always good (or inevitable, and a deep rooted bias) And that "good" needs context or is a simplification. I'nt language fun: it's both logically correct and incorrect to say that progress is always progress. ;)