4 ms·
my point is that we should oppose the system that forces everybody to be in market competition with each other. I understand the position being forwarded, but I
by beaconstudios 5y ago
my point is that we should oppose the system that forces everybody to be in market competition with each other. I understand the position being forwarded, but I think it's describing a system that's antithetical to human values and thus should not be just accepted as a fact like gravity.
Perhaps it is you who is being shallow and trite, not understanding the actual objection I have. I know that what the OP is saying is a description of how to optimise your economic standing - I've done it plenty myself because optimisation comes naturally to me; I'm saying that's a shite way to live and invest your time and energy.
- jka 5y agoMarkets can behave in ways that are either competitive (my tomatoes are better than your tomatoes) or co-operative (my tomatoes are a perfect complement to your cheese). And sometimes they morph from one mode into the other.
- beaconstudios 5y agoMaybe this is a definitional argument, but I'd say the latter would be complementary, not cooperative. A cooperative model is one where people work together to achieve an outcome, like two kids working together on a school assignment. Outside an individual company, competition is favoured over cooperation, except when companies work together on e.g. supply chains.
- jka 5y agoYep, you're correct about that terminology, thanks. I'll leave my comment as-is because it'll be less confusing for anyone reading yours. It's possible that companies (knowingly or unwittingly) co-operate under some circumstances, though - even if competition is generally the {expected/favoured} model.