39 for the dual attack on Poland and Britain and 42 for US involvement after Pearl Harbor no mention of the financial support of specific sides for years befo

39 for the dual attack on Poland and Britain and 42 for US involvement after Pearl Harbor no mention of the financial support of specific sides for years before either date In my experience they cover rise of national socialist germany, like stuff in 1932 like reichstag fire, night of broken glass Very piecemeal and as a chronology after WW1 but not sure what level of detail is really relevant The main parallel i could see is that the russia military advances on ukraine wouldnt be a US start date of the conflict and that it wont be over in months but maybe we’ll get an official start date in 3-5 years The other parallel is that I always noticed it was a choice to protect nations you promised to protect, britain could have just … not backed poland, and a preemptive attack on the british to slow British retaliation maybe wouldn’t have occurred or could have been talked out of. Two months ago that would have been seen as “edgy”, but yeah nobody wants to actually back ukraine so looks like people were thinking it for some time.