> To be specific it was misinformation to say it was a lab leak, now it’s generally accepted. Which is a case of some people happening to guess, one time, that

> To be specific it was misinformation to say it was a lab leak, now it’s generally accepted. Which is a case of some people happening to guess, one time, that an ultimately highly unlikely thing (based on available information) happened. To peddle such an unlikely, unconfirmed claim as fact before there's actual evidence still isn't/wasn't reasonable. They didn't know it was a lab leak. They wildly guessed. Yet they never treated it as speculation, they prematurely treated it as fact. Current evidence likewise strongly supports the idea that the 2020 election is legitimate.