2 ms·
Just trying to read the article I was rejected from 3 IP addresses by their junk-yard dog "Wordfence". And I didn't like the overly upbeat tone of it. So yes, t
by nonrandomstring 5y ago
Just trying to read the article I was rejected from 3 IP addresses by
their junk-yard dog "Wordfence". And I didn't like the overly upbeat
tone of it. So yes, the statement seems full of parochial
self-congratulation for those "in the club".
Please, the "ultimate tool of resilience" was mRNA and the
extraordinary efforts of biologists. It was hospital staff who died
working 18 hour days without PPE.
This narrative that "technology saved us" in the pandemic is cute, but
also puff and bluster.
We're still dealing with the equal and opposite effect of web
technologies in spreading anti-vac messages and conspiracy theory.
The winners were Google and Amazon. Not "the web".
The paragraph "A web for everyone" pays lip service to acknowledging
that "an estimated 37 percent of the world’s population lacks web
access". Yet effectively shrugging responsibility for stewardship onto
Google, a for-profit company bent on eliminating privacy and dignity
online, isn't a good look for W3C.
It hides another reality, the one in which the pandemic showed our
normative reliance on Web technology is itself a form of irresilience.
Our world is precarious in the absence of other parallel and
supporting technologies, of offline, radio, good public transport,
functional (healthy not overcrowded) physical community spaces,
reliable mail service, stable electricity supply and much more.
There's a reality in which some people with unequal access to digital
technology suffered more than if other social measures had been taken.
Those with older phones and computers, the wrong browser, not enough
money for bandwidth and those in rural areas were all marginalised.
Those who value privacy and don't wish to lay their lives at the feet
of a few giant tech corporations.
The "Web saved us from the pandemic" story makes it easier and more
acceptable to exclude marginal groups within our own society.