4 ms·
Is anyone honestly shocked that this actually happens with Google? It does seem kind of strange that they would pick such a high profile as Donald Trump to do
by elmerfud 5y ago
Is anyone honestly shocked that this actually happens with Google? It does seem kind of strange that they would pick such a high profile as Donald Trump to do this with but this is simply an extension of basic marketing adage of "if you don't like what's being said you change the conversation."
When there's actual serious conversations about getting rid of public libraries in favor of private companies. When people have willfully given away their culture to effectively infinite copyright. When we have groups of people espousing the idea that the public cannot be trusted with information to make informed decisions on. This is the end result. We get a curated response from the technology overlords that we put in place and then wave our hands private company not beholding to free speech or free information.
What's surprising to me more than something like this is that there are people in the open source community that support this kind of closed information and curated disclosure. They have forgotten the core principles that knowledge and information should be free. If you can convince someone to willfully put the shackles on their mind and accept that the idea of thoughts can be owned or thoughts by themselves can be dangerous you have them convinced that person to give up their freedom and that person will thank you for it.
- hsnewman 5y ago"if you don't like what's being said you change the conversation", isn't that exactly what 45 did?
- elmerfud 5y agoWhen you ask an individual or a political figure about their political viewpoints you're expected to get a political biased answer. When you ask an information indexer, that should have no political narrative bias, about information you expect to get as best as can be provided neutral information. I'm not sure if you just didn't watch the video or if this is some sort of straw man question you're tossing out there. But for an information indexer to refuse to respond at minimum with the Wikipedia article about who Donald J Trump is is clearly some sort of information bias that they're putting out there. I would hope regardless of our political opinions on the man the idea of free information is something everyone can support.
- ColinHayhurst 5y agoSpot on. Information neutrality seems to mean nothing to Google search now. It was suffering a slow death under the less obvious practice of "personalisation", and is falling fast with algorithmic answers "keeping you on the SERPS page". Actions like this on legal content are a death blow.