I don't think the analogy fits, since these are voices and outlets that are being effectively made inaccessible to Western audiences. There's the purist view o

I don't think the analogy fits, since these are voices and outlets that are being effectively made inaccessible to Western audiences. There's the purist view of free speech and then there's the practical one ("is it free speech if none can hear it"?). I'm obviously talking about the most important one: the latter.