2 ms·
zero banning, full freedom of speech. How to do it: user selectable curation/filters/moderation without requiring an account (explicit web pages or/and URL par
by sylware 5y ago
zero banning, full freedom of speech.
How to do it: user selectable curation/filters/moderation without requiring an account (explicit web pages or/and URL parameters). Actually, an "official" curation/filter/moderation could be the default, and users would have to take up steps to go no curation/filters (https://www.freedomofspeach/forums?zero_moderation=on https://www.freedomofspeach/forums?zero_moderation=on)
There is always the issue of children/young teenagers: the only reasonable option is proper parenting regarding internet access, and we all know it is easier to say than to do.
Obvious side effect: if you keep all the trash, you will need bigger technical resources and very probably, ppl won't turn off the default curation/filter/moderation and this trash will be sort of technically "costly".
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- dane-pgp 5y ago> you will need bigger technical resources I don't think it's censorship to put resource limits on services, as long as they apply equally to every account (and companies can obviously try to limit accounts to one per person). In fact, I think it's even reasonable to say that your resource limits can differ based on how much you are willing to pay, or how much users like your posts. At the limit, if you're sending spam (which no one wants) then all your posts will be disliked, so you are granted zero resources and can't send any more spam. That reasonably balances one person's right to free speech against everyone else's right to not have to listen.
- sylware 5y agoThis would be one filter/moderation/ban mode, but the user would be able to choose to disable such mode and get verbatim all messages in time sorted threads or some other mode (namely all the trash).