> Given the modern examples of how information systems can affect people's mental health, I think it's reasonable to assume that an unencrypted network has the

> Given the modern examples of how information systems can affect people's mental health, I think it's reasonable to assume that an unencrypted network has the potential to be quite dangerous to anyone that happens to come under attack. That is, perhaps unusually, why I think it could, under some circumstances, be far preferable for (some? most?) network traffic to be more transparent. (and yep, totally agree with you that identity and integrity are important to maintain)