3 ms·
> sorry bad writing and need too much effort may I say. I’m sorry but his writing was much more intelligible than yours. This writing is an academic critique
by alephnan 5y ago
> sorry bad writing and need too much effort may I say.
I’m sorry but his writing was much more intelligible than yours.
This writing is an academic critique by an academic. Some context is expected and they’re writing for their audience ( academics and people who have used RPC or have an opinion on them ).
- commandlinefan 5y agoPretty sure you missed the joke. And I agree with OP that the linked article is pretty impenetrable - he does seem to have something to say, but he doesn't do a good job of saying it. He starts off with what seems to be a very pedantic criticism of the term "RPC" which may be perfectly valid, but he doesn't back it up at all other than to say that procedures exist in programming languages.
- epgui 5y agoWithout defending the other commenter, I'll say I agree about the article being poorly written. I'm a slow & careful reader, and I found the poor grammar and confusing constructions difficult to follow.