I would assume because the technic is absurd but it was not important during the trial. The important fact was they did find a human corpse where they were look

I would assume because the technic is absurd but it was not important during the trial. The important fact was they did find a human corpse where they were looking. You probably need to say how you found the corpse, if was probably labelled 'vaguely' like 'using the technic "n#13" teached by the National Forensic Academy'and I assume no one really looked at it. (or they did but didn't care because they did'n wanted the culprit to get away with having a corpse in his backgarden or wathever happened. Total speculation of course.