3 ms·
I listed specific weaknesses in the paper you haven't addressed, so if there's anybody here arguing in bad faith: look in the mirror. Additionally, note that i
by emn13 5y ago
I listed specific weaknesses in the paper you haven't addressed, so if there's anybody here arguing in bad faith: look in the mirror.
Additionally, note that it's trivial to google something like "lockdown effectiveness" in a private-mode window to escape your bubbel; and you'll see there are tons of papers arguing either case. Beyond it's technically poor analysis, it's also not representative of expert consensus; nor is the author an expert in the field, nor does he honestly portray expert opinion.
- CryptoPunk 5y ago>>I listed specific weaknesses in the paper you haven't addressed, so if there's anybody here arguing in bad faith: look in the mirror. I'm not going to evaluate your claims more closely when I see very elementary mischaracterizations of the paper in your initial comments, showing you didn't make a genuine effort to appraise it.
- emn13 5y agoAh yes, all those mischaracterizations you haven't been able to point out. Got it.