3 ms·
It also means having the wherewithal to take the source's prejudices and priors into account, as part and parcel of the meaning and intent you glean from the tr
by noduerme 5y ago
It also means having the wherewithal to take the source's prejudices and priors into account, as part and parcel of the meaning and intent you glean from the true portion of their argument. Which is to say, any true thing spoken by an American shill for RT has to also be considered for what specific purpose its inclusion on that channel serves. To accept information without understanding the purpose and bias behind it is even worse than not knowing anything at all.
- tejohnso 5y ago> an American shill for RT This is absurd. His RT content was in the same vein as his books, and his work published while at The New York Times. His work is consistent with his principles, regardless of the medium, or the source of funding.