1. Yep. As you say - the guy is smart enough to know better. 2. I'm sure he is - this article comes off to me as a highly intelligent person ranting. I'm calli

1. Yep. As you say - the guy is smart enough to know better. 2. I'm sure he is - this article comes off to me as a highly intelligent person ranting. I'm calling out that his appeal to precedent is, at best, weakly laid out in this article (and at worst it's dishonest). As I said, I agree with elements of the argument that he's making, but he's made the arguments poorly here.