4 ms·
I prefer the somewhat focused approach of skype, rather than the multi-channel type kitchen sink used by teams. To communicate you've got "Chat" then "Teams",
by dvhh 5y ago
I prefer the somewhat focused approach of skype, rather than the multi-channel type kitchen sink used by teams.
To communicate you've got "Chat" then "Teams", On "Chat" you can reply to one message, and on "Teams" you can post on the Threads to reply.
On the UX side, at one point I experienced bad memory leak if GPU acceleration was enabled, The shortcut for starting the voice call is the same as the "paste only the text" shortcut in other application (causing more than one department wide voice conference started by accident)