Did you read the article? Your original comment was just an implicit discrediting of the author. It’s hard to see how point is relevant to the main concepts of

Did you read the article? Your original comment was just an implicit discrediting of the author. It’s hard to see how point is relevant to the main concepts of the ‘article’(small book). I’d be happy to hear your expanded thoughts on the implications of ‘that something can be used as a unit of account does not mean that it is used as unit of account’ has on any of the more interesting points at play.