Overall this is an interesting response, but you missed the main point of my comment. Why is there no hard evidence of the claims made in the article? > What w

Overall this is an interesting response, but you missed the main point of my comment. Why is there no hard evidence of the claims made in the article? > What world do you live in where this is unbelievable? A world where if this ever happened there would be dozens standing up and objecting these comments, making a scene, and stating this is unacceptable. A world where this is so outrageous no one would even think about making such comments nor any comments orders of magnitude less offensive. A world where people are so afraid of being perceived as racist that they could never conceive of saying something like this, and when heard if it ever happened couldn't believe they were hearing it. > Is a $1 million arbitration win enough for you to believe them?[0] Or do you think that was also just based purely on hearsay? Are you're aware this is the salary of highly paid software engineer? This is peanuts and a minimal prize to get rid of the issue. > Surely, if this was all made up propaganda, Tesla would be the first to say so Why? Do you know Tesla's strategy? This is a public trial as well and a difficult situation for Tesla. Is denying the issue going to make it go away faster? Is anyone going to believe Tesla were they to claim it's all lies?