But that still requires you to believe that the arbitrator was either fooled or corrupt, which seems like it would also require some pretty clear evidence to be

But that still requires you to believe that the arbitrator was either fooled or corrupt, which seems like it would also require some pretty clear evidence to be believable, no? Especially since these arbitrators are typically biased in favor of the company who wrote them into the employment agreement, if anyone. And Tesla would then have a history of these judgments - you go to arbitration to avoid legal precedent, sure, but in the court of public opinion that's an awful thing to have.