Hi This article, like most human opinions, is selfish. It disregards that other people want 5G. It concerns itself with only a personal preference of one human

Hi This article, like most human opinions, is selfish. It disregards that other people want 5G. It concerns itself with only a personal preference of one human being who lives in an area where population density is probably 5 per 100 square miles........ You can't even send a photo when connected to LTE at a crowded NY International Airport,even though the signal is strong,five bars, and you're connected but there are also other people connected. It took me 20-30 minutes to send a photo via Viber last time. Yes sure they could build a second tower and use 4G but 5G might solve that with one tower and less money, it's also better........ Yes 5G will probably make more money and that's great, if it didn't make money it wouldn't make sense, and in the process maybe next time I'll be able to send a message and maybe people who want more than 20 Mbps can have more.......... It's very selfish to assume the purpose of building wireless communications is to watch football games and Netflix, while that is one purpose for some people, other people use it for something else. There are those who hoard data, I'm not one of them but I do recognize, people who work from home and need lots of speed and reliability etc.......... I would understand if this article had an argument such as "5G is unhealthy" but it doesn't. This article's argument is "I don't know why they would need 5G as 4G works fine in Canada" and then it implies people shouldn't progress on the mere argument that the need for progress isn't understood by the writer. I don't claim to understand the need for 5G but I acknowledge that I don't possess that knowledge, the writer doesn't acknowledge that he does not know why those people are building 5G. He basically argues 4G works fine for me therefore all the engineers should stop working. ....... One shouldn't make an argument on what other people should do based on personal situation and own opinion disregarding what they want and think, unless 5G causes pollution or health hazard. Let it be. ....... Yes the writer might think the word sceptic might have masked the implications of the article, it didn't. Also word sceptic doesn't actually mean what it's euphemism means today. A sceptic is someone who thinks, and here the writer only thought his own thoughts, didn't think about what others need and might think, so not a sceptic at all, in this article at least. ....... Opinions are great when they include other people, when they include only the self they're just selfish.