4 ms·
For me 5G has been absolutely wonderful. It made my connection at home about 2x faster than whatever we have at the city office. And about 50x faster than what
by darthrupert 5y ago
For me 5G has been absolutely wonderful. It made my connection at home about 2x faster than whatever we have at the city office. And about 50x faster than what I had at home before. Also much more stable latencies.
- novok 5y agoYou must have some pretty crappy wired ISPs
- darthrupert 5y agoPerhaps. There was some indication that the wiring in our house caused some trouble for our previous VDSL. But even if it had worked at advertised speeds, 5G would have given me roughly double the speed. As it was, 5G gave us about 50x better and stable connection. Only fiber directly to our house could top that, but unfortunately that's not available here yet. Plus costly.
- chimeracoder 5y ago> For me 5G has been absolutely wonderful. It made my connection at home about 2x faster than whatever we have at the city office. And about 50x faster than what I had at home before. Also much more stable latencies. But why are you using 5G at home in the first place? Where are you that 5G actually outperforms your wired connection (accessed through WiFi)?
- tyrfing 5y agoIt's cheaper than fiber internet here. Costs less for the same bandwidth, without a contract and without data caps - unlike the wired option. Assuming the latency is usable, unlike 4G, it's starting to be a very competitive option. If you're stuck with 12mbps copper like some areas, it's a very obvious choice.
- darthrupert 5y agoSuburbs. I don't understand the doubt. Why does everyone expect that 5G wouldn't work for this case? It's just a way to connect the last kilometer to a fiber network without expensive (and in my case, unavailable) cabling work.