2 ms·
> If their eyes are unable to resolve the smaller pixels it will offer no benefit. Sorry, I don't understand. The pixels would be bigger in the idea I'm propos
by computator 5y ago
> If their eyes are unable to resolve the smaller pixels it will offer no benefit.
Sorry, I don't understand. The pixels would be bigger in the idea I'm proposing.
> A 27"+ monitor made ~10 years ago would be ideal.
That's exactly what they have now. I'm suggesting replacing it with a 49-inch monitor (a Ultra HD TV) set to the same resolution. The pixels would therefore be bigger.