3 ms·
That's not how I read the second point. As I understood it, he is saying the fact that Apple is the offensive party in the patent mess is a sad obsequy to Jobs
by patrickas 15y ago
That's not how I read the second point.
As I understood it, he is saying the fact that Apple is the offensive party in the patent mess is a sad obsequy to Jobs’s otherwise colossal achievements.
- redthrowaway 15y agoRead the second part of the second point again. "but with such gigantic sums of money in so huge a market at stake it is little wonder that others will do all they can to “crack” Apple."
- gridspy 15y agoSteven Fry's point seems to be that others are copying Apple. Apple then asserting its patents is seen as a expected result.
- redthrowaway 15y agoI think that's a reasonable, if extremely generous reading of his words.