The precedent the article discusses is that use of autonomous driving may void comprehensive insurance, making the driver fully liable for any compensation. Not

The precedent the article discusses is that use of autonomous driving may void comprehensive insurance, making the driver fully liable for any compensation. Not mentioned is if this might also affect compulsory 3rd party insurance, which would make this tech effectively illegal in Australia. Quoting the article: "David McCarthy – a former journalist and current consultant for automotive manufacturers – told Drive the incident and upcoming court case will be significant for two reasons: It will set a precedent for driver culpability in the eyes of the law, and will set a precedent for insurance companies paying out claims based on 'driver responsibility'. “The comprehensive insurance on the car is unlikely to pay for the damage if she says she wasn’t in control of the vehicle … Further, to my knowledge there hasn't been a case in Australia involving the use of autonomous technology in an accident and it will be up to the court to determine liability here."