3 ms·
Are you referring to "Git the standard format" or "Git the CLI" ? If the former, then yes I agree. If the latter, then definitely not, and I appreciate too
by kitd 5y ago
Are you referring to "Git the standard format" or "Git the CLI" ? If the former, then yes I agree. If the latter, then definitely not, and I appreciate tools like Fossil & Mercurial that offer alternatives.
- SQLite 5y agoSome issues with "Git the standard format": * Does not track cherry-picks * Does not track branch names * Tags must be unique. (You cannot add a "release" tag to every release, for example.) * Not easily extensible - witness the pain and years of effort trying to move from SHA1 to SHA2.