4 ms·
Yes, it’s those characters (in Kanji/Japanese), in Hanja/Korean it would have been 發射, the glyph for the first character is different even though it’s the same
by nereye 5y ago
Yes, it’s those characters (in Kanji/Japanese), in Hanja/Korean it would have been 發射, the glyph for the first character is different even though it’s the same ideograph in Unicode (due to Han unification).
https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/發 https://en.m.wiktionary.org/wiki/發 shows each of the three variants for CJK.