> But the Samaritan acted. Helped someone. Did a thing. > Action is not signaling. Action is action. I don't really understand why those would have to be excl

> But the Samaritan acted. Helped someone. Did a thing. > Action is not signaling. Action is action. I don't really understand why those would have to be exclusive. I think taking action to help people is important, and if suddenly everyone became aware every time someone helped someone else to the point where it became an expectation, I guess I don't really see why this would be a problem. At the end of the day, if more people are genuinely being helped due to being charitable becoming table stakes, I don't really care whether the help only happened due to ego or due to actual benevolence. I can see it becoming a problem if people weren't actually helping people and only signalling, but I don't really see how that would apply to companies giving people time and space to grieve and then also setting the example for the rest of industry.