My thinking was that it allows us to continue to improve yields without corresponding costs being paid by the consumers. In other words, people will just keep b

My thinking was that it allows us to continue to improve yields without corresponding costs being paid by the consumers. In other words, people will just keep buying huge quantities of cheap meat. I do not consider this a good thing because meat is a luxury. In this case, it's keeping meat cheap(er) despite screwing the planet with climate change.