3 ms·
Not saying you're wrong, but do you have a source for the 60/1000x number? Curious to read more.
by glmdev 5y ago
Not saying you're wrong, but do you have a source for the 60/1000x number? Curious to read more.
- daniel-cussen 5y agoYeah, where did I read it, I think John McCarthy checked it out along with...who could it have been...definitely him.
- lispm 5y agoToday one Lisp Machine CPU emulator written in assembler is 80 times faster than the original Lisp hardware. This could be made faster by a JIT compiler. Native code Lisp compilers for x86-64 or Apple's M1 are roughly 800 times faster than the original Lisp hardware (the third generation Ivory processor).
- daniel-cussen 5y agoWow! Really?! So the M1 really is faster in a non-gimmicky way? I could cut out this X86-64 assembly bullshit, at 800x I could be happy just with Lisp. Assembly all based on C by this point anyway...