Actually the term is technically incorrect. Correlation DOES IMPLY causation somewhere. It's just the causative source may not be part of the experimental para

Actually the term is technically incorrect. Correlation DOES IMPLY causation somewhere. It's just the causative source may not be part of the experimental parameters. Think about it. Hand grip and longer lifespan. For those two things to correlate they MUST at the very least be connected by one or several causative sources. There is no other logical explanation for it. It's just this source isn't part of the experimental parameters. On the other side of the coin if two things Do NOT correlate, it heavily implies no causative connection at all.