3 ms·
That doesn't make much sense. You should be able to get arbitrarily good meshes by generating more and more viewpoints.
by hwers 5y ago
That doesn't make much sense. You should be able to get arbitrarily good meshes by generating more and more viewpoints.
- andybak 5y agoOK. So that's using a render of a NERFfield as input into photogrammetry? Yeah - that might be more feasible. I was talking about directly generating a mesh from the NERF density itself (marching cubes). But NERFs can capture and render things that are very difficult subjects for photogrammetry: Fur, vegetation, reflective or transparent surfaces etc.