3 ms·

The actual data instead of some weird announcement: https://ddosecrets.com/wiki/Central_Bank_of_Russia https://ddosecrets.com/wiki/Central_Bank_of_Russia Made

The actual data instead of some weird announcement: https://ddosecrets.com/wiki/Central_Bank_of_Russia https://ddosecrets.com/wiki/Central_Bank_of_Russia Made a submission about it (the data) here (before I found this submission): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30810275 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30810275

aaron695 5y ago
> instead of some weird announcement So lets not go to the actual source and go to the link which claims to also be real? If someone wants to centralize these, cool (Is it the NSA doing it for Unit 8200 or maybe you are Fancy Bear?) But how about we start at the source before going straight to dumbing it down. ddosecrets - "There are a number of datasets <> that we've received and declined to publish for various reasons <> we do not acknowledge rejected datasets." Given this is 8 parts, how would we know that ddosecrets hasn't cut stuff out?
- chockchocschoir 5y ago
  Dude, DDoS is established as a good source for the leaks. I've downloaded the torrent/magnet myself and it's proper, it has all 10 parts in it. Verified as well by downloading from Mega and comparing hashes, it checks out. Anyway, DDoS is already established as a trusted distributor of data leaks, if you don't know this, I'm not sure why you're throwing around terms like Unit 8200 or Fancy Bear, like you know what you're talking about (which btw, I take as a compliment that you think I'm a part of). It's not dumbing down to link directly to a trusted source of the data itself. Feel free to use both sources, like I did. But if you want to avoid Twitter and the videos anonymous usually bundles with their announcements, DDoS is a good distraction free source.
  - aaron695 5y ago
- Komodai 5y ago
  ddosecrets is well-known unlike some random ass "anonymous" twitter account.
- rosndo 5y ago
  > So lets not go to the actual source @latestanonpress is not the actual source, every single “anonymous” twitter account is run by a different idiot.

aaron695 5y ago

> instead of some weird announcement So lets not go to the actual source and go to the link which claims to also be real? If someone wants to centralize these, cool (Is it the NSA doing it for Unit 8200 or maybe you are Fancy Bear?) But how about we start at the source before going straight to dumbing it down. ddosecrets - "There are a number of datasets <> that we've received and declined to publish for various reasons <> we do not acknowledge rejected datasets." Given this is 8 parts, how would we know that ddosecrets hasn't cut stuff out?

chockchocschoir 5y ago
Dude, DDoS is established as a good source for the leaks. I've downloaded the torrent/magnet myself and it's proper, it has all 10 parts in it. Verified as well by downloading from Mega and comparing hashes, it checks out. Anyway, DDoS is already established as a trusted distributor of data leaks, if you don't know this, I'm not sure why you're throwing around terms like Unit 8200 or Fancy Bear, like you know what you're talking about (which btw, I take as a compliment that you think I'm a part of). It's not dumbing down to link directly to a trusted source of the data itself. Feel free to use both sources, like I did. But if you want to avoid Twitter and the videos anonymous usually bundles with their announcements, DDoS is a good distraction free source.
- aaron695 5y ago
Komodai 5y ago
ddosecrets is well-known unlike some random ass "anonymous" twitter account.
rosndo 5y ago
> So lets not go to the actual source @latestanonpress is not the actual source, every single “anonymous” twitter account is run by a different idiot.