5 ms·
Oh yes. For Republicans, it's usually national security and crime that justifies anti-personal-liberty laws. The Republicans are not the party of liberty. Amon
by CryptoPunk 5y ago
Oh yes. For Republicans, it's usually national security and crime that justifies anti-personal-liberty laws.
The Republicans are not the party of liberty. Among senators, only Rand Paul, and Democrat Ron Wyden, voted against FOSTA for example:
https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1152/vote_115_2_00060.htm https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1...
National security and suspicion of foreign nations is also why the restrictions Republicans support often relate to how people interact with non-Americans. This can be seen in Republican support for sanctions and tariffs.
But I was commenting about raw milk and how the Democrats' philosophy on personal rights to consume commercial products relates to it.