I feel like the general use of accuracy assumes no false positives. When I hear "accuracy" in general conversation I assume it's 99% percent chance of a true po

I feel like the general use of accuracy assumes no false positives. When I hear "accuracy" in general conversation I assume it's 99% percent chance of a true positive and a 1% chance of false negative and ignore chance of a false positive and true negative when considering accuracy. Of course everyone already mentioned the various ratios that scientifically actually make up accuracy.