> I'd expect that the gatekeeper's API would allow access from multiple clients, just as the normal clients would I'm just cynical enough to believe those gate

> I'd expect that the gatekeeper's API would allow access from multiple clients, just as the normal clients would I'm just cynical enough to believe those gatekeepers would totally accidentally make their API as cumbersome to use as possible while still technically meeting the requirements. ;) > The problem is that if you run a dedicated bridge to an E2EE messenger like WhatsApp from a VPS, then that VPS becomes a massive attack target. The usual cautionary disclaimers when self-hosting apply. But probably still a less juicy target than the hypothetical bridge provider TFA outlines. Someone offering Whatsapp bridging as a service is quite a nice attack target.