You bring up the recency of these articles to bolster your argument, but it is detrimental to your point. Particularly from these sources. Alarmist regurgitatio

You bring up the recency of these articles to bolster your argument, but it is detrimental to your point. Particularly from these sources. Alarmist regurgitation is the standard, popsci-brand churn. If there's a click bait title that is going to drive views they'll print. You might be right. I doubt that. These don't strengthen your position