> I'm not the one constructing evidence or claiming to know what's in his mind. False. This is precisely what you have done, and the evidence is plainly seen i

> I'm not the one constructing evidence or claiming to know what's in his mind. False. This is precisely what you have done, and the evidence is plainly seen in your comments. > You're the one busy with that strawman. This statement is in fact an example of ad hominem fallacy and straw man fallacy. > You're the one doing the whole "what he thinks" shtick. Again, this is both ad hominem and straw man. I have supported my position with Colbert's known disposition and his very own words. > Which I repeatedly said is redundant. This is a new and separate claim, which, because of the content of the claim and the lack of actually previously claiming such, the statement is currently false.