3 ms·
That "small" group would consist of something like 100 people, not 5. If you want to appeal to nature, it's less natural for your family to be your entire socia
by deadbeeves 5y ago
That "small" group would consist of something like 100 people, not 5. If you want to appeal to nature, it's less natural for your family to be your entire social circle, than for it to include casual workplace acquaintances.
- weatherlite 5y agoNot sure why you're being downvoted, this is the truth. We are much closer to a pack of chimps than anything else, definitely not 2-3 family members (and even 2-3 members is optimistic considering divorce rate and plummeting child bearing) . We lived in groups of a few dozens of members for hundreds of thousands of years.