3 ms·
Well, if you code something up cost-effectively to save on initial investment, you should be aware of the cost of re-working the solution if the solution become
by strictfp 15y ago
Well, if you code something up cost-effectively to save on initial investment, you should be aware of the cost of re-working the solution if the solution becomes more permanent. Blaiming these type of deficiencies on Mozilla effectively is just tranfering cost off your company. So the LTS should be funded by the asking customers. I'm not sure if this is already taking place, but just blaming Mozilla for not standing still seems out of place.
- AndrewDucker 15y agoDepends on whether Mozilla _wants_ to serve those customers. Mozilla's not a for-profit company, its aim is to get its browser into as many places as possible. If it does that by spending a bit of cash/worker time on a project to make it more amenable to Enterprises then that helps its aims too. The question is where is the cash best spent.