3 ms·

I'm not the one constructing evidence or claiming to know what's in his mind. You're the one busy with that strawman. I pasted his quote and mentioned my interp

• Maursault 5y ago
  > I'm not the one constructing evidence or claiming to know what's in his mind. False. This is precisely what you have done, and the evidence is plainly seen in your comments. > You're the one busy with that strawman. This statement is in fact an example of ad hominem fallacy and straw man fallacy. > You're the one doing the whole "what he thinks" shtick. Again, this is both ad hominem and straw man. I have supported my position with Colbert's known disposition and his very own words. > Which I repeatedly said is redundant. This is a new and separate claim, which, because of the content of the claim and the lack of actually previously claiming such, the statement is currently false.
  • invalidname 5y ago
    First reply to you: "His intentions though are irrelevant." Yet you persist to cherry pick...
    • Maursault 5y ago
      I think I see, when you say you "repeatedly said was redundant," what you meant was you mentioned something once. Thanks, I was a little confused there because the words you use actually mean something else... but your intent matters more than the semantics.