> You might be right. The few people that do try to align with that tend to call themselves "reactionaries", or even "neo-reactionaries". I disagree. The "neo

> You might be right. The few people that do try to align with that tend to call themselves "reactionaries", or even "neo-reactionaries". I disagree. The "neo-reactionaries" I'm familiar seems ridiculously, over-the-top radical. It's like libartarianism taken so far it had an integer overflow and wrapped around to monarchism. It's not conservative to want to blow up society an replace it with a mockery of an old one that rejects what everyone across the political spectrum actually believes now.