4 ms·
> a bourgeois-liberal perversion and appropriation of the energy of these movements Sounds like a deflection, and inaccurate. The issues don't arise "outside"
by lanfeust6 5y ago
> a bourgeois-liberal perversion and appropriation of the energy of these movements
Sounds like a deflection, and inaccurate. The issues don't arise "outside" of the movement, they spring inevitably when there is enough traction and zeal because the mob doesn't understand nuance. Mobs are dogmatic and orthodox, and everything is a nail. The Fabians (a bougie socialist club intent on popularizing Socialism) had this fear about laymen should Socialism be in vogue, the Catholic Church about the Bible being interpreted by the public, etc. - they were all correct. Media of course is in it for the money, they just do what they've always done which is exploit salience.
- pea 5y agoInteresting, thanks for sharing your perspective. Do you think both could be true?
- slothtrop 5y agoTo the extent that media exploits things, you could easily frame that as a perversion, but I guess this isn't about that. The fact that platforms like Twitter are optimized to maximize controversy exacerbates things, which is kind of perverse. Ultimately people do the legwork. I think ascribing bad behavior like witch hunts to "the bourgeoisie" is a weaselly, weak argument.