4 ms·
The OECD published the results of a massive survey of member countries some years ago, titled "Skills Matter" (https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/skills-ma
by ilamont 5y ago
The OECD published the results of a massive survey of member countries some years ago, titled "Skills Matter" (https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/skills-matter_9789264258051-en https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/skills-matter_978926...).
The researchers defined 4 levels of technology proficiency, based on the types of tasks users can complete successfully. There was a very good summary published here (https://www.nngroup.com/articles/computer-skill-levels/ https://www.nngroup.com/articles/computer-skill-levels/) and excerpted below.
For each level, here’s the percentage of the population (averaged across the OECD countries) who performed at that level, as well as the report’s definition of the ability of people within that level:
"Below Level 1” = 14% of Adult Population
Being too polite to use a term like “level zero,” the OECD researchers refer to the lowest skill level as “below level 1.”
This is what people below level 1 can do: “Tasks are based on well-defined problems involving the use of only one function within a generic interface to meet one explicit criterion without any categorical or inferential reasoning, or transforming of information. Few steps are required and no sub-goal has to be generated.”
An example of task at this level is “Delete this email message” in an email app.
Level 1 = 29% of Adult Population
This is what level-1 people can do: “Tasks typically require the use of widely available and familiar technology applications, such as email software or a web browser.
There is little or no navigation required to access the information or commands required to solve the problem. The tasks involve few steps and a minimal number of operators.
The reply-to-all task described above requires level-1 skills. Another example of level-1 task is “Find all emails from John Smith.”
Level 2 = 26% of Adult Population
This is what level-2 people can do: “At this level, tasks typically require the use of both generic and more specific technology applications. For instance, the respondent may have to make use of a novel online form. Some navigation across pages and applications is required to solve the problem. The use of tools (e.g. a sort function) can facilitate the resolution of the problem. The task may involve multiple steps and operators.
An example of level-2 task is “You want to find a sustainability-related document that was sent to you by John Smith in October last year.”
Level 3 = 5% of Adult Population
This is what this most-skilled group of people can do: “At this level, tasks typically require the use of both generic and more specific technology applications. Some navigation across pages and applications is required to solve the problem. The use of tools (e.g. a sort function) is required to make progress towards the solution. The task may involve multiple steps and operators. Integration and inferential reasoning may be needed to a large extent.
The meeting room task described above requires level-3 skills. Another example of level-3 task is “You want to know what percentage of the emails sent by John Smith last month were about sustainability.”
Can’t Use Computers = 26% of Adult Population
The numbers for the 4 skill levels don’t sum to 100% because a large proportion of the respondents never attempted the tasks, being unable to use computers. In total, across the OECD countries, 26% of adults were unable to use a computer.
That one quarter of the population can’t use a computer at all is the most serious element of the digital divide. To a great extent, this problem is caused by computers still being much too complicated for many people.
Let that phrase sink in: across the OECD countries, 26% of adults were unable to use a computer. In some countries like Japan, the number is even higher (about 1/3 of Japan's population can't use computers, which may reflect the aging population, poor interface design, or some other factor.)
- jacquesm 5y agoAnd why should they? Just like there are people that don't read books and that don't watch TV using a computer should not be a mandatory thing. What it could be is a way to streamline stuff but there should always be alternatives. And older people have enough issues in their lives to be dealt another bunch of hardship from those that they are pretty much forced to do business with. But banks and other institutions have a hard time empathizing with the people whose representatives do not work at the bank. Banks are rapidly shifting to going online completely, shutting down all of their offices and making it google-level impossible to contact them because that part costs them some money and they only really want the profitable parts of banking.
- ilamont 5y agoAgree. I would take this imperative a step further: There needs to be a technology bill of rights, in all countries, to serve everyone from the retired doctor in the article to the HN user who suffers an AI lockout.
- alistairSH 5y agoJust like there are people that don't read books and that don't watch TV using a computer should not be a mandatory thing. "don't read" and "can't read" aren't the same thing. Same for computers. A baseline ability to read is required to function in modern society. I'd argue the same is true for computers. That doesn't imply the user MUST use a computer or read books regularly on their own, only that they should be able to read or use a computer when life requires. All that said, I do agree that there should be alternatives to online forms for paying bills, etc.
- MikeDelta 5y agoAnd in addition to that, it's not just using a computer but also being able to navigate a poorly designed UI.
- masswerk 5y agoSomething I observe with people new to computing at an old age: They try to reduce any task to "below level 1", aiming at writing this down as a sequence of atomic steps of a recipe. There is no confidence in being able to remember how a task is to be achieved at any future point. There is also no confidence and therefor no interest in acquiring the basic grammar of user interfaces. (E.g., double-clicking is not linked to a general operation of opening something represented by an icon, but just another step in a list of how to conjure a certain view onto the screen, identify an "image" and then double clicking it.) – The real problem is the lack of confidence and therefor a lack of any further interest in learning and an anxiety regarding exploring. BTW, all members of my small (and anecdotical) sample are academics, who formerly held managerial or teaching positions. (Most of them also had some introduction to computers decades ago, but never used this in real life, thus never developing a practical skill.) Now compare this to smartphone UIs based on swiping and hidden functionality. There's no chance. Edit: Also 2FA, which requires complex interoperation on two different devices using dissimilar metaphors, each involving complex operations on their own. This is totally inaccessible.