> implying that their paper should never have been published. That's really not what I meant. I have no problem with the publication. But put yourself in the s

> implying that their paper should never have been published. That's really not what I meant. I have no problem with the publication. But put yourself in the shoes of someone such as myself, who's intubated tens of cases on admission and probably killed many doing so. Wouldn't you be questioning the structure of our research system then? Not that I have any better solution at hand, mind you...