Refuting the RR paper was an exception, because it was such a high profile paper used by many policy makers in a critical economic situation. I’ve seen colleag

Refuting the RR paper was an exception, because it was such a high profile paper used by many policy makers in a critical economic situation. I’ve seen colleagues waste weeks to get any kind of attention to clear, and when pointed out, quite obvious errors in scientific papers. The original authors have responded with insults, and the editors have had no interest in publishing any kind of criticism.