I don’t believe everything is constructed and I don’t believe in most statements of moral relativism. However the people involved in the arguments generally fav

I don’t believe everything is constructed and I don’t believe in most statements of moral relativism. However the people involved in the arguments generally favor some view of subjective truth and/or moral relativism, at which point why do they care? (Similar to the question of: if people claim gender is a social construct how can someone be the wrong one?) I think the solution is nothing new, it relies on going back to teaching a classical liberal definition of tolerance and the objective morality of empathy and compassion. No need to reinvent the wheel.