3 ms·
That is an incoherent conception of "equity". I don't really see how you can consider the pursuit of equity not to involve things like opening up otherwise excl
by uoaei 5y ago
That is an incoherent conception of "equity". I don't really see how you can consider the pursuit of equity not to involve things like opening up otherwise exclusive (e.g. medical treatment) options to under-resourced individuals.
Equity is nothing more than the "to each according to their need" half of traditional Marxism. And from what I can tell no one really has a problem with the latter half -- all critiques I've heard focus only on the former.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- DiggyJohnson 5y agoYou’re giving a completely unconstrained analysis here. What do you mean by “opening up…under-resources individuals?” If this isn’t happening along racial lines, then I agree. But if it is, then your second paragraph is hypocritical.