People that claim "natural" is better than "artificial" have the burden of defining those terms and supporting with evidence why one should be better than the o

People that claim "natural" is better than "artificial" have the burden of defining those terms and supporting with evidence why one should be better than the other. I have never seen anyone who uses those terms come close to doing this. Nobody can even define what those words mean, much less provide evidence for the claim. So I classify "natural > artificial" as pure BS and not-even-wrong until proven otherwise.