3 ms·

Of course it isn't good that the warranty is being voided, but as a matter of contract this particular clause seems very logical. For the consumer it is good to

Of course it isn't good that the warranty is being voided, but as a matter of contract this particular clause seems very logical. For the consumer it is good to know when you are being provided a third-party service/app that could void a warranty, and a clause like this makes the third-party provider liable for non-disclosure of the risks.

awinter-py 5y ago
but they're not being provided a 3rd-party app that voids a warranty they're getting a 1st party app that (if you think this contract is enforceable) voids the warranty in practice, this whole page of products https://fujifilm-x.com/en-us/products/software https://fujifilm-x.com/en-us/products/software probably (I'm guessing) uses the sdk, is probably advertised as part of the product's value, and doesn't say anything about warranty if fuji finds out you used the camera with photoshop, then uses that to reject a subsequent repair (related or unrelated to sdk), this seems like a reasonable case for false advertising and a refund